For now, it seems that I’ve concluded the battle with the following statement:In Danemark, a resident is taxed at a rate of 60%. Nationality Canada United States: Occupation: author, editor, journalist: Known for: editor, Financial Post: Background. print, commercial broadcast, film, digital)Anyone in your organization can use it an unlimited number of times for up to 15 years, worldwide, with uncapped indemnificationProtect your creative work - we'll remove this image from our site for as long as you need it. It is not double-taxation when a resident of Danemark is only taxed by the Danish tax authorities.Yet, when the Dane works in America, the Dane is only taxed at a rate of 15%. And yet she can lecture others on their ‘wrongdoing’?Why is nobody taking a hard look at her blatant dishonesty?Perhaps it’s similar to the “tax avoidance” that Ms Francis speaks of — milking the country of each of her dual citizenships as the journalist???? This earlier blog of hers says he was a Brit: Diane Francis – an Old Blog, which says she married a Brit. Why is she a supporter of US citizenship-based tax policy? US Person in Canada, Diane Francis: Is this person 100% FBAR, 8938, 1040, etc. Does anyone there read what she writes before publication? She is married and has two adult children. She was a Visiting Fellow at Harvard University’s Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy and has been a Media Fellow for the World Economic Forum for 20 years.Diane divides her time between Toronto and New York City.I feel that letters to the editor that are actually printed and published have much more exposure and impact.I suggest that those who have an opinion on Ms. Francis’ position (now stated unequivocally at least twice in her Post columns) send in this weekend a letter that is very short (e.g., three sentences) and absolutely courteous but “determined”, to the “letters” site of the National Post:You will need to disclose your name, address, and phone number.Even if no letter is individually printed, the National Post might well comment on the editorial page that many such letters raising this issue have been submitted.I filled out the form but get no icon to “Send”. We don’t need trailer trash like that in OUR country! Not that I personally oppose dual nationality I am surprised that someone like Diane Francis would be in favor of it. Here, the best one can hope for is to find oneself under the control of a fairly enlightened regime occupying all three levels of government.Diane Francis’s husband immigrated from Britain to the US and then when he received a draft notice both of them left for Canada.There is a section of Diane Francis and her husband in the Google Book belowPretty pricey on Amazon.com, but you can have a look at some pages inside the book: I am curious how she was able to naturalize as a Canadian citizen in the 1970s when dual nationality was prohibited.Why doesn’t she really write a National Post column of real interest — or include all her and her husband’s story on her “About” page?She likely changed her mind and went along with the US changing their law. Therefore, the views expressed in comments and articles belong to the individual writers and do not necessarily represent the collective opinion of the Isaac Brock Society. Does someone handle and pay for this compliance for Ms Francis?And, why does she use the term “Tax Avoidance”? That’s how Washington stopped its crooks and gangsters from setting up shop in the Bahamas decades ago and how it catches most of them now.Meanwhile, Canada lets its richest go offshore; allows the economy of a province to be owned by Bermudian trusts; allows the family of a former prime minister to make a tax-free fortune offshore and then leaves the rest of us to pay the tab every Tax Spring.I occupy the unenviable position of being both a Canadian and an American citizen which means that I must file and pay taxes to each country.The Americans, and now the Australians, are the only nations that tax people on the basis of citizenship irrespective of residency. Please carefully review any restrictions accompanying the Licensed Material on the Getty Images website, and contact your Getty Images representative if you have a question about them.
Only an international tax regime, and rewriting of tax treaties that facilitate cheating, will.To that end, the Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is preparing a template for international tax collection to eliminate loopholes and rein in evaders that will be presented this fall to the G20. Frank Francis receives no mention in her 2007 entry in Canadian Whos Who, only the two children. Dianne Francis is a fool and her husband is a crook. This earlier blog of hers says he was a Brit: Frankly, Canadians and others should adopt American tax laws where citizens are taxable irrespective of their residency. She has absolutely no regard (and likely no knowledge) of the immense “collateral damage” that US tax law is presenting for US citizens and residents in Canada in punitive penalties imposed by the IRS OVDI programs.. Liberty and justice for all United States persons abroad The Isaac Brock Society is a website, an open forum to discuss the issues of United States citizenship, extra-territorial taxation, FBAR, and FATCA. The Getty Images design is a trademark of Getty Images.This account has reached the download cap, additional downloads subject to agreement overage terms. There was a blue send button just below the letter form using the link in my posting above. However, unless a license is purchased, content cannot be used in any final materials or any publicly available materials. She immigrated to Canada in 1966 and was naturalized Canadian citizen.